Builtie
Seattle permits issued · Jan 25 – Jun 26
Seattle Construction Report · H1 2026

H1 2026The most expensive median permit on this list.

Seattle's median permit states $139,508 — higher than Nashville, Chicago, Vancouver, Calgary or New York. Volume is flat at 3,011 and screened value is up 27% to $1.80B. Seattle does fewer, larger, better-documented jobs: 99.1% of its permits state a construction cost.

PREPARED BY Builtie Market COVERAGE Jan 1 to Jun 30, 2026 SOURCE Seattle permit record · live database UPDATED September 4, 2026
3,011
Permits issued
January 1 to June 30, 2026 · -1% YoY
$1.80B
Declared construction value
Screened permit-stated cost · +27% YoY
$140K
Median permit value
Largest single permit $127.6M
68%
Renovation share
Of classified H1 permits
01Market Pulse18-month trend

Flat count, stronger value.

Monthly volume sits between 350 and 620 in both years with no trend. The value line runs consistently above 2025 from February onward.

Permits issued and screened construction value

Monthly · Jan 25 to Jun 26 · value in $M
02Where The Work Landsnot yet mappable

We would rather show you nothing than the wrong map.

Known gap

1,633 Seattle permits carry coordinates and not one of them lands in Seattle. Our geocoder resolved these addresses against an Ontario context, so they plot in southern Ontario instead — a bug on our side, not a gap in the city's data. We check every coordinate against the bounding box of the city it claims to be in, which is why this section is empty rather than showing you a map of the wrong place.

Re-geocoding is queued. Every other number on this page reads from the permit record itself and is unaffected — the map is the only section that depends on coordinates.

03Who Pulls The Permitsnot yet reportable

We will not rank this market on 2.2% of it.

Known gap

Only 2.2% of Seattle permits name an applicant — 65 of 3,011. A leaderboard built on that would rank whoever happens to have been recorded, not whoever is busiest.

Builtie resolves the firms behind a project from company and decision-maker records rather than from the permit form alone, so this gap constrains this page — not the platform. Ask for live sample projects in this market and you will see named companies against them.

04What Is Being Builtwork mix

A quarter new, two thirds alteration.

Work category

H1 2026 · share of classified permits
New construction
715 · 24%
Renovation / alteration
2,060 · 68%
Demolition
236 · 8%

Permit type as the city files it

H1 2026 · top 6 by count
TypePermitsValue
Building / Addition/Alteration1,990$493M
Building / New715$488M
Demolition / Demolition159$633M
Demolition73$124M
Building / Tenant Improvment70$64M
Demolition / Deconstruction4$2M
05The Biggest Jobsby stated cost

The ten largest jobs of the half.

Ranked by the construction cost stated on the permit, after the value screen described in the methodology. These are single permits, not whole developments — a tower can appear as several.

#WorkApplicantStated cost
1Demolish institutional building [UW CHEMISTRY LIBRARY] per plan.3923 OKANOGAN LN NE$127.6M
2Demolish Northern portable classroom accessory to Aki Kurose Middle School per plan.3928 S GRAHAM ST$100.0M
3Demolish Southern portable classroom accessory to Aki Kurose Middle School per plan.3928 S GRAHAM ST$100.0M
4PHASED PROJECT: Construct mixed-use apartment building with below-grade parking occupy per plan. Mechanical included with Phase 2.1740 NW MARKET ST$52.6M
5Demolish existing commercial building per plan.1766 NW MARKET ST$49.2M
6Demolish existing commercial building per plan.1752 NW MARKET ST$49.2M
7Demolish commercial building per plan.1740 NW MARKET ST$49.2M
8Demolish existing commercial building per plan.1734 NW MARKET ST$49.2M
9Construct addition & substantial alterations to institutional building (Aki Kurose Middle School) occupy per plan. Mechanical included3928 S GRAHAM ST$41.9M
10Demolish existing multifamily building per plan.2404 2ND AVE$34.0M
06How This Market ComparesH1 2026, all tracked cities

The same half, in every market Builtie tracks.

Permit counts are directly comparable. Dollar figures are not fully comparable across borders and jurisdictions — each city defines "construction value" its own way, and the coverage column shows how many of its permits state one at all. A market is marked withheld where that share is too low to stand behind.

MarketPermitsYoYScreened valueAvg per costed permitCost coverage
New York53,624n/a$17.14B$376K85%
Miami20,481+0%$9.88B$495K97.4%
Austin14,915-2%withheldn/a7%
Calgary9,603-14%$2.93B$333K91.6%
Nashville4,287-1%$1.69B$394K100%
Chicago3,667-1%$4.88B$1.3M100%
Seattlethis report3,011-1%$1.80B$604K99.1%
Hamilton2,337-7%$897M$405K94.7%
Vancouver2,036-9%$3.11B$1.6M98.2%
07Methodologyand what we could not measure

What is behind every number above.

A report is only worth the disclosure attached to it. This is the whole of it.

How the figures are built

definitions
Source
Seattle's own published building-permit record, ingested into the Builtie platform and read live from it. No third-party estimate is mixed in.
Period
Permits issued between January 2, 2026 and June 30, 2026. Applications and cancellations are excluded.
Declared value
The construction cost stated by the applicant on the permit. It is not a contract value, and it excludes land and soft costs. 2,985 of 3,011 permits (99.1%) state one; the rest contribute to the count and not to the value.
The value screen
Two classes of bad value are removed before any total: any single permit at or above $1,000,000,000, and any value at or above $10,000,000 that repeats on five or more permits in the same city — a parent project total stamped onto its sub-permits, which would otherwise be counted once per sub-permit. 3 Seattle permits were screened out this half. A percentile trim was tested and rejected: it cannot tell a corrupt value from a genuine large tower.
Rounding
Values are rounded to the nearest million before display; shares are rounded to the nearest whole per cent, so columns may not sum to exactly 100.

What this page does not tell you

known gaps, stated on purpose
No approval timeline
This feed sets the application date equal to the issue date on every row, so we cannot say how long Seattle takes to approve a permit. The field is 100% populated, which is exactly why it is easy to mistake for real: it is a placeholder, and a "same-day approval" chart drawn from it would be a fabrication. The GTA report carries this section because Toronto publishes a genuine application date.
No density map
1,633 permits carry coordinates and every one of them falls outside Seattle — our geocoder resolved the addresses against the wrong region. Coordinates are validated against each city's bounding box before anything is plotted, so the section is withheld rather than wrong. Re-geocoding is queued.
No applicant leaderboard
The applicant field is populated on 2.2% of Seattle permits — too few to rank anyone honestly.
On coverage

Builtie's coverage is North America wide and it is not uniform, because permit data quality is set by what each municipality publishes. The Greater Toronto Area remains the deepest market for project, builder and decision-maker data. Ask us for live sample projects in Seattle before you take any number here on trust — that is the right test, and we would rather you ran it.