Which Miami-Dade Builders Are Most Active? A Permit-Based Ranking Method

Aerial view of Miami-Dade construction, tower crane over a mid-rise frame with the skyline behind it
Illustrative editorial image. Builtie construction intelligence content.

A Miami-Dade builder ranking is only useful if a reader could reproduce it. Counting every permit row overstates activity, because one project routinely generates trade permits, revisions and inspection records on top of the original filing. Here is the method that avoids that, and what a ranking built this way can and cannot tell you.

Find, qualify, identify, reach Findpermits, planning records,builder posts, site checks Qualifyscored 0 to 100 for yourprofile, stage and territory Identifythe company and the personwho awards the work ReachLinkedIn and email, underyour name, done for you

The same four steps, whether the buyer is a builder, a designer, an owner or a company you want to acquire.

Count distinct projects first, then permit volume

Group permits into projects using a stable identifier, address or folio before counting anything. Report the number of distinct projects in a stated period as the headline figure, and show raw permit volume separately, labeled as what it is. State the exact start and end dates of the window and which jurisdictions and sources are included in it.

RuleStandard
Time windowExact start and end dates
Counting unitDistinct projects first, permit volume shown separately
GeographyCity of Miami, unincorporated county, or a named municipality
EvidenceAn official record behind every row
InterpretationActivity is not workmanship

How the ranking is built

How a Miami-Dade builder ranking is produced 1 Pull every permit issued in the stated period From the county and municipal open-data feeds, not a sample and not a subscription list 2 Group permits into distinct projects By address, folio, or another stable identifier, so one project is not counted five times 3 Normalize the builder or applicant name Punctuation, spacing and clerical markers vary permit to permit and can split one company into several entries 4 Weight by trade fit and recency, not raw count alone A builder with many small permits should not automatically outrank a developer running fewer, larger projects 5 Publish the method with the ranking So a reader can check the work rather than take the order on trust

Every step is meant to be reproducible from the public record. A ranking that cannot be checked is not a ranking.

What activity does and does not prove

Permit activity tells youIt does not tell you
The builder is licensed and filing work right nowWhether the work was done well, or on time
Roughly how many projects a builder is running at oncePayment history or financial standing
Which jurisdiction the builder is active inWhether a specific package is currently open
The pace of a builder's filing over timeHeadcount, revenue, or whether they are hiring

Permit activity does not prove workmanship, payment history, or that a package is currently open. It tells you where to look next. Builtie uses a ranking like this as a starting point, then connects each project to the people who may control the next conversation, so an active builder becomes a name and a verified contact rather than just a row on a leaderboard.

Where this data comes from

Miami-Dade County's Open Data Hub is the county's public source for permits, certificates of occupancy, maps and applications, and its Building Online Services page links permit records, inspections, contractor inquiry and code cases in one place. Miami-Dade says its 35 municipalities each have their own building official, so a project inside one of them can still need county review. City of Miami records are checked separately, in iBuild.

Builtie plans start at $79 per month per seat for 20 projects a month, and $99 for 50. Growth adds LinkedIn and email outreach you run from the platform; Starter does not include Outreach. Done-for-you — where Builtie's team runs the content, campaigns and replies for you — is the Custom plan. There is a 7-day free trial with 10 projects.

Which plan fits you?

Starter, $79 per seat per month. 20 matched projects a month, which is $3.95 for a fully worked project — the decision maker, their verified email, phone and LinkedIn, the site context and the opening script all included in the one credit. Credits reset each month, and you can top up with a credit pack any time. Sourcing that by hand runs about twenty minutes a project, so the plan buys back roughly seven hours a month. Pick it if you already have someone sending the messages and what you are short of is a qualified list. It does not include Outreach.

Growth, $99 per seat per month. Twenty dollars more buys two and a half times the projects — 50 a month, $1.98 each — plus the entire outreach layer: LinkedIn and email sequences, campaigns, the unified inbox, events and social signals. Anyone opening more than 20 projects a month is better off here on volume alone, before counting the ten to fifteen hours a week that automated follow-up gives back. Pick it if someone on your team will log in and run it.

Done-For-You, the Custom plan, from CAD $1,500 a month. Pick it when the honest answer to “who is going to run this?” is nobody. Builtie's team writes the content, runs your LinkedIn, Instagram and email, answers the comments and DMs, builds and manages the campaigns, A/B tests the messaging, analyzes your followers and your competitors, and hands you the conversations. It sits on top of a Growth seat and is quoted against your trade, territory and channels. See everything Done-For-You covers, or compare all three on the pricing page.

Frequently asked questions

Are Miami-Dade County records complete for every Miami project?

No. County and municipal departments have different responsibilities. Identify the jurisdiction behind every builder's record before comparing activity across it.

Does a permit mean a builder's next project is accepting bids?

No. A permit confirms a regulatory event, not that a package is open. Confirm bid status with the project contact.

Why rank distinct projects instead of raw permit rows?

One project can generate a permit, trade permits, revisions and inspection records, all tied to the same address. Counting every row overstates how much a builder is actually doing.

How should a ranking like this be refreshed?

State the exact refresh date and source beside any table or count, since a builder's activity changes every time a new permit is filed.