The Cities Builtie Covers, and How Many Projects Since 2024

Workers on rebar cages at a large construction site
Every project on this page started as a public record in a city that publishes one.

Builtie tracks ten metros across the United States and Canada, together holding 1,024,996 building permits issued since January 2024, all of them at full depth: scored projects, build stage, and the people who award the work. This page gives the numbers city by city rather than averaging them into one coverage claim.

Find, qualify, identify, reach Findpermits, planning records,builder posts, site checks Qualifyscored 0 to 100 for yourprofile, stage and territory Identifythe company and the personwho awards the work ReachLinkedIn and email, underyour name, done for you

The same four steps, whether the buyer is a builder, a designer, an owner or a company you want to acquire.

The map

Cities Builtie covers, sized by permits since January 2024 New York421,285 Austin148,576 Miami-Dade139,222 Chicago86,591 Toronto65,840 Calgary61,367 Seattle50,630 Nashville26,344 Vancouver12,809 Hamilton12,332

Circle area is permit volume since January 2024. Green is live at full Builtie depth, blue is a city for its numbers, or read the same figures in the table below.

Every city, with its numbers

CityPermits since Jan 2024SourceName on the recordFill
New York, NY421,285City open data, DOB NOW build filingsapplicant and owner business name100%
Austin, TX148,576City open data, issued permitscontractor company name90%
Miami-Dade, FL139,222County open data, permit recordscontractor name100%
Chicago, IL86,591City open data, issued permitscontact name, with role100%
Toronto, ON65,840Builtie ingest, full historybuilder, plus identified peopleon the record
Calgary, AB61,367City open data, issued permitscontractor name66%
Seattle, WA50,630City open data, trade permitscontractor company name84%
Nashville, TN26,344Metro open data, issued permitscontact100%
Vancouver, BC12,809City open data, issued permitsbuilding contractor, else applicant61% / 100%
Hamilton, ON12,332Builtie ingest, full historybuilder, plus identified peopleon the record
Total1,024,996

Counted on September 3, 2026. Toronto and Hamilton are counted from Builtie's own records; the other eight are counted directly against each city's official open-data service on the permit issue date, except New York, which is counted on filing date because its issued-permit dataset has published nothing since 2025.

A page for every city

Each city has its own page with its permit volume by year, what its record carries and what a trade contractor should know about that market.

What full depth means in every one of these cities

A vendor that says it covers a hundred cities is usually counting places where it can fetch a permit record. That is not what this list is. Every city here carries the same depth:

  • Permits with their history. Not a single snapshot, but the record over time, which is what makes a builder's filing rhythm visible rather than a one-off address.
  • Projects scored against your profile. Your trade, your project types, your territory and the stage at which your package is decided, so the feed is jobs you could actually win.
  • Build stage on the project. The field that separates an open package from one awarded months ago, and the reason timing beats price on most trades.
  • The people who award the work. Traced past permit applicants, agents and numbered companies to the operating company, and to a person there by role, with email, phone and LinkedIn where each can be verified.

Toronto holds 225,161 permits in total and Hamilton 113,927, which is what a decade of ingest looks like. Since January 2024 those two carry $52.9 billion and $4.9 billion of declared and estimated construction value respectively.

Why the fill rate is on this page

A permit without a name on it is an address. Each city publishes a different field for the company doing the work, and each fills it in to a different degree, so the fill rate is the single most useful number for judging whether a feed will produce someone to contact.

  • New York, Miami-Dade, Chicago and Nashville publish a name on effectively every record.
  • Austin and Seattle sit in the eighties and nineties, so a small share of records arrive with the company blank.
  • Calgary at 66 percent and Vancouver at 61 percent leave a real gap on the contractor field. Vancouver publishes an applicant on every record, which is the better fallback, and that is why two numbers appear in the table.

Chicago is worth a note: its contact field carries the role alongside the name, which separates a general contractor from an electrical contractor on the same permit. That distinction decides who a trade should actually approach, so it is preserved rather than flattened to a bare name.

How the counts were produced

  1. One date rule per city. Permits issued on or after January 1, 2024, using each city's own issue-date field, so a slow permit office is not penalized for a backlog of old applications.
  2. Counted at the source. Each number is a count run against the city's official open-data service on September 3, 2026, not an estimate and not a projection.
  3. No deduplication across cities. Every record belongs to exactly one city, so the total is a sum rather than a claim about unique projects.
  4. Permits, not projects. A large build can carry several permits, and a small one carries a single permit. The count measures permit records, which is the unit the cities publish.

If your city is not on this list

Coverage expands to wherever a municipality publishes usable permit data, and the honest answer for any city not listed is that the source has not been verified yet. Tell us the city and we will check what it publishes and how well the contractor field is filled, which is the same test every city on this page had to pass. If a municipality publishes nothing usable, no vendor can serve it well, whatever their coverage map shows.

What this means for a trade contractor

Wherever you work on this list, the shape is the same: projects at the stage where your package is bought, with the buyer identified and outreach running from your own accounts. What changes city to city is the volume you will see and how completely the local record names the company doing the work, which is why both numbers are published above rather than averaged away.

Builtie plans start at $550 per month per seat for 50 matched projects a month, and $880 for 200. Every plan includes done-for-you LinkedIn and email outreach, and there is a 7-day free trial with 10 projects.

Frequently asked questions

What cities does Builtie cover?

Ten metros across the United States and Canada: New York, Austin, Miami-Dade, Chicago, Toronto, Calgary, Seattle, Nashville, Vancouver and Hamilton. All ten carry full depth: permit history, projects scored against your trade and territory, build stage on each project, and the people who award the work identified.

How many construction projects does Builtie cover since 2024?

1,024,996 building permits issued since January 1, 2024 across the ten metros, counted on September 3, 2026. New York is the largest at 421,285 and Hamilton the smallest at 12,332.

Is coverage the same in every city?

The depth is: every city carries permit history, scored projects, build stage and identified decision makers. What differs is volume and how completely each municipality names the company on its own records, which is why both the permit counts and the fill rates are published on this page rather than averaged into one number.

What does the fill rate mean?

The share of permit records where the city actually publishes a company name for the work. It ranges from 61 percent in Vancouver to 100 percent in New York, Miami-Dade, Chicago and Nashville, and it is the best single indicator of whether a city's feed will produce someone to contact.

Can I get coverage for a city that is not listed?

Ask. Coverage extends to any municipality that publishes usable permit data, and the check is quick: what the city publishes, how often, and how completely the contractor field is filled. Where a city publishes nothing usable, no provider can serve it well.